Showing posts with label Ali Smith. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ali Smith. Show all posts

Wednesday, 18 February 2015

Vladimir Nabokov, Despair; Ali Smith, How To Be Both; Muriel Spark, The Driver's Seat

It's been a while since I posted, but it's the beginning of Lent and I'm trying to replace Facebook with  reading, so I thought it'd be a good time to start blogging again.

Vladimir Nabokov, Despair

A set text for the 'Ludic Literature' module I'm taking this semester, this short novel is narrated by Hermann Hermann, a Russian émigré businessman in Berlin who unexpectedly meets a man who appears to be his perfect doppelgänger. He concocts an elaborate plan to secure him and his wife financially, the details of which gradually emerge as he tells his story.

Hermann is a forceful narrator, rhetorically persuasive and severely deluded, much like Lolita's Humbert Humbert, and much of our discussion in class centred around the nature of his delusion. We theorised that he, like Humbert, has tried to use his life as an aesthetic 'laboratory', rather than confining his experiments more appropriately to the page. I wondered if there was a connection between the repeated name and the delusion that he has managed to unify life and art; but perhaps this is far-fetched.

As with several other Nabokov novels, there's a lot of exploration of mirrors, doubling, self-splitting and so on. There's a fair amount of narratorial misogyny. It's a very funny novel, and readable, though not the thing to read if you want to be emotionally gripped. It's not as engrossing as Lolita, nor as dazzling as Pale Fire, but an enjoyable read nonetheless.

Ali Smith, How To Be Both

My mum and I have been great fans of Ali Smith for six or seven years, and this wonderful novel was a reminder of why: her warmth, her playfulness, her fearlessness when it comes to fictional innovation. Sometimes I worry that British literary fiction is too safe, that a vacuum in the highbrow zone is being filled with decidedly middlebrow writing. Ali Smith is a great antidote to this. Her plots can usually be summarised in a few bullet points; the drama is all mental, intellectual, emotional, creative. 

This latest novel was shortlisted for the Booker (her third shortlist -- she's surely due a win soon ...) and won the Goldsmiths Prize, the Costa Novel Award and the Saltire Society Literary Book of the Year Award in 2014. It's in two sections, each titled 'One', and is famously available in two versions, with the two sections in different orders. In my version, the first section focuses around George, a grieving, intellectual teenager in the twenty-first century, and the second on a renaissance painter struggling to establish a reputation despite various (some unexpected) hindrances. The stories intertwine both thematically and, sort of, dramatically, with a healthy dose of magical realism.

My mum and I both agreed that reading the sections in the opposite order would probably have been extremely confusing, so I wonder how successful the conceit of two equal, non-ordered sections really is. (No point in trying to re-read them in the opposite order, of course, now my ignorance has been destroyed.) I also think one section is more emotionally involving than the other, although the other section makes up for this in the way it analyses creative and artistic processes. But there are some wonderful passages in both -- funny, defamiliarising, shocking and thoughtful by turns. Her favourite issues -- art, gender, sexuality -- come up again, though in pleasingly new and ambiguous ways, and there are some others too: the ubiquity of pornography; bereavement and memory; sibling relationships; and so on. 

The prose is not always easy; indeed, sometimes it's not always prose. Read it slowly, sure, but read it all the same.

Muriel Spark, The Driver's Seat

Although Penguin cheekily charge £8.99 for this book, it's really a novella rather than a novel, padded out to just over 100 pages by an elegantly large font (not that I was protesting -- my eyes slid through the prose with grateful ease). A woman, Lise, leaves the office to go on holiday, meets a couple of people on the plane, arrives in a 'southern' city where there seem to be a lot of Fiats, befriends an old woman at the hotel who's waiting for her nephew, insists she's searching for her 'boy-friend', assesses who is and isn't her 'type', and eventually reaches a sticky end.

This isn't a spoiler: you're told this very early on. Spark shifts the question from 'What will happen?' to 'Who will do it?' and 'Why?' and, most often, 'Is this woman a complete lunatic?' It's told in a third-person impersonal narrator, in the present tense, as if we're a camera following Lise about, semi-analysing her movements at times, but mostly just watching. We've no idea what she's thinking. Details at the beginning gain their relevance by the end, so she clearly has some kind of plan, but not a rational or sane one. It's disorientating, frustrating, and fascinating. As John Lanchester's introduction points out, we can tell easily enough that she's mad, but then what? It doesn't seem to help us much.

Coincidentally, this week I've been reading about 'poetics of indeterminacy' -- specifically with reference to Rimbaud and John Ashbery, but pretty useful generally -- the idea that a text has no internal coherence, wants to be suggestive rather than cohesive, resists interpretation and simply enjoys its own play. As with Rimbaud and Ashbery poems, individual sentences of The Driver's Seat, or paragraphs, or even whole scenes, seem to make sense, but are almost immediately cancelled out by the next thing. Details that seem to have great symbolic significance, like whether her mouth is closed or open, appear not to resolve into an overall pattern. It's great fun trying to puzzle out what she's planning, whether she cares, what's in her head, and there's a certain amount of pleasure in the knowledge that you probably won't find out. 

For readers who don't like this so much, there are some exceptionally beautiful and comic descriptions -- for instance:
She switches on the central light which is encased in a mottled glass globe; the light flicks on, then immediately flickers out as if, having served a long succession of clients without complaint, Lise is suddenly too much for it.
And, at a brief 106 pages, there's almost no excuse not to read it. I pretty much polished this off in an evening and was left bewildered and excited by it. Highly recommended.

Friday, 15 March 2013

Recent Reading and Recommendations


Exhausted as I am from writing that absurdly alliterative title, I wanted to update with a brief note about what I've been reading in the last few weeks:

  • Jeffrey Eugenides, The Marriage Plot - If you've read either of Eugenides's other novels (The Virgin Suicides and Middlesex), you'll know he's a writer of phenomenal imaginative power, very learned and very funny. These qualities are again exhibited in The Marriage Plot, though perhaps not to the same degree, or as consistently. The novel follows three undergraduates at Brown as they fall in love, graduate and attempt to begin their lives, confused about how to live in a post-modern where Derrida and Barthes dominate. I loved the satire of 1980s intellectual fashion -- it appealed particularly to my memories of stumbling through literary theory at university -- but in other places the writing feels a little lazy. The balance of narrative between the three characters also felt wrong, with one perhaps neglected compared to the other two; but overall it's an engaging and humane novel, if not quite as magnificent as his previous two.
  • Wilkie Collins, The Moonstone - This was another gap in my literary knowledge, and did not disappoint: I raced through it in less than a week because it is both gripping and highly readable, and the last part, in which the characters try to recreate the disappearance of the prized diamond in order to try to work out what happened to it, is particularly interesting. A recognisable prototype for a kind of forensic detective fiction which really took off with Sherlock Holmes. At times with Collins, as with his more famous friend Dickens, you wonder how much his misogynistic protagonist is simply ventriloquising his own views, but this wasn't so annoying as to destroy my enjoyment of the whole.
  • Charlotte Bronte, Jane Eyre - I reread this rapidly on a whim. There isn't much to say about its brilliance that hasn't been treated better and in more detail by others; but I had forgotten how comically dry Bronte can be at times.

  • Ali Smith, Artful - This is a series of four lectures that Smith gave at St Anne's College, Oxford, dealing with 'time', 'form', 'edge' and 'offer and reflection'. As suggested by the title, the lectures are partially entangled with Oliver Twist -- Smith says she reread the novel whilst writing them -- but draw on a breathtakingly wide array of literature, film and music. She weaves thoughtful, but only lightly analytical, commentary on her topics into a narrative about a bereaved person finding her dead lover's scholarly notes (i.e. the lectures). The imitation of early novels where the authors had to invent an excuse for the narrative existing (e.g. in Moll Flanders, Pamela and Les Liaisons Dangereuses) is presumably deliberate, and it adds a lightness of touch and a humour which is quintessentially Smithian. As inspirational pieces for students at Oxford, I imagine these went down a storm.
  • Fiona MacCarthy, The Last Pre-Raphaelite: Edward Burne-Jones and the Victorian Imagination - After months of eyeing this up, first in hardback and then in paperback, I persuaded my partner to buy it for me for Christmas. I'm only a quarter of the way through, and am enjoying it immensely: it's readable and vivid, and made me cross when I realised I'd just missed the Pre-Raphaelite exhibition at the Tate, which has now gone on tour to the USA and taken all the normally resident masterpieces with it. My only problem with the book is that it does treat some events and topics more briefly than I would have liked. It has the air of a work that was cut intensively before publication, and although paring down is a highly-encouraged habit amongst writers, in this case I think it has diminished the quality of the whole. My indignant letter to Faber and Faber will be in the post today ...

The final thing is that after March my commission for Mslexia will be finished and I'll be back blogging here more regularly. Thanks to everyone who said nice things about those posts!